![Youtube download thumbnail](https://cdn1.cdnme.se/5447227/9-3/screenshot_5_64e62947ddf2b306ca76f796.jpg)
![dxo pure raw capture one dxo pure raw capture one](https://i2.wp.com/lifeafterphotoshop.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/dxo-comparison-02-detail-scaled.jpg)
![dxo pure raw capture one dxo pure raw capture one](https://www.wkhub.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/1622045564_dxo-pureraw_01.jpg)
Sometimes I prefer the rendering of one and sometimes the other. The color rendering is definitely different between DXO and Capture One as is relative contrast, etc. I don't especially like the interface of DXO but that's because I'm not as used to it. I am using both DXO Deep Prime and Topaz Denosie (with Capture One as my preferred raw processor for Topaz Denoise files).ĭXO Deep Prime can extract more detail than Topaz with less noise. It seems like Adobe is starting to add new AI features, so I will likely hold out for their version of AI noise reduction.ĭXO is totally worth a trial to see if it is a good fit for you, though. Unfortunately, I personally find the interface a bit clunky to replace lightroom and I find the workflow less than ideal when used with lightroom (requires saving intermediate files). I tried DXO and Deep Prime noise reduction is fantastic.
![dxo pure raw capture one dxo pure raw capture one](https://photowebexpo.ru/assets/uploads/images/BIRZHAKOV/NEWS/dxo-photolab-4_01.jpg)
As with most software, there is a free trial version. In some instances, it really does allow for more detail to be cleanly shown. I have never used Topaz, but the DxO PhotoLab 4 does an excellent job with its DeepPrime noise removal. Probably the same as Topaz software for any format. I’m not sure where, but I recall a few instances of people mentioning that DXO’s latest software gives a new lease on life for MFT files.
![Youtube download thumbnail](https://cdn1.cdnme.se/5447227/9-3/screenshot_5_64e62947ddf2b306ca76f796.jpg)